|
|
|
Medical Abstracts
Page 5
|
Comparison of Karydakis versus midline excision for
treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.
Pediatric Surgery International, October 2005
Morden P, Drongowski RA, Geiger JD,
Hirschl RB, Teitelbaum DH.
Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's
Hospital, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann
Arbor, MI 48109-0245, USA.
Abstract:
Pilonidal sinus disease is associated with a high rate
of recurrence and complications. The Karydakis (KAR)
method, whereby an asymmetric subcutaneous flap
obliterates the anal crease, has been shown to be
effective in adults. The goal of this study is to assess
the efficacy of the KAR procedure in the operative
treatment of children with pilonidal sinus disease
compared to those treated via a midline excision (ME).
Sixty-eight cases of pediatric pilonidal sinus excision
were reviewed over the past 10 years. Data abstracted
included surgical approach, complication rate and
recurrence rate. Student's t-test or the Chi square test
was used for statistical analysis, with P < 0.05 being
considered significant. An ME was performed in 44
patients; the KAR method was used in 24 patients. Mean
age at diagnosis was 14.4 +/- 4.2 years for the ME group
compared to 15.7 +/- 4.3 years for the KAR patients (P =
0.18). Mean operative time was significantly longer with
the KAR method (58.7 +/- 25.6 min) compared to 46.3 +/-
18.6 for the primary ME (P = 0.04). Despite the
increased operative dissection, there was no difference
(P = 0.42) in early post-operative complication rates
between groups (25% in the KAR group compared to 34.8%
in the ME group). Initial drainage of an abscess had no
significant effect upon the recurrence/complication rate
in either group. Recurrence rate alone was lower in
patients operated on via the KAR approach 0% versus
11.0% using the ME (P = 0.153). Recurrence and
complication rates were lower for those patients with a
pilonidal sinus treated by the KAR method compared to
the ME, but the results did not reach significance. In
conclusion, this study does show a potential benefit for
children treated with the KAR method for pilonidal
sinus. This study mimics the data obtained in adult
patients and suggests that a larger study is likely to
achieve significance.
|
Radiofrequency
sinus excision: better alternative to
marsupialization technique in sacrococcygeal pilonidal
sinus disease.
Journal of the National Medical Association,
July 2005
Gupta PJ.
Gupta Nursing Home, Laxminagar, Nagpur, India. drpjg@yahoo.co.in
BACKGROUND: A number of techniques have been described
for treatment of patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal
sinus disease. The author reports his experience in the
surgical management of pilonidal sinus using
radiofrequency sinus excision technique. The results are
compared with those obtained after excision and
marsupialization procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Seventeen patients were operated by radiofrequency sinus
excision and 18 with excision and marsupialization. An
Ellman radiofrequency device was used. The two groups
were matched for age, gender and presentation symptoms.
The median follow-up was two years. The patient's
satisfaction on the outcome of the procedure was also
evaluated. RESULTS: In the radiofrequency sinus excision
group, we found on average a shorter operation time (10
vs. 36 minutes, p < 0.001), shorter hospitalization
(nine vs. 30 hours, p < 0.001), significantly less
postoperative pain, fewer cumulatve requests for
analgesia by the patients (14 vs. 25 tablets, p <
0.001), and earlier return to work (six vs. 16 days, p <
0.001) The wounds with marsupialization did heal faster
than those with sinus excision; however, the difference
was not significant. At two year follow-up, one patient
from each group had a recurrence. CONCLUSION: This pilot
study shows that this new technique can be performed as
a day care surgery. With reduced postoperative pain and
early resumption to work, patient satisfaction is better
in comparison to excision and marsupialization
technique.
|
Successful treatment of recurrent
pilonidal sinus with laser
epilation.
Dermatologic Surgery, June
2005
Landa N, Aller O, Landa-Gundin N,
Torrontegui J, Azpiazu JL.
Dermitek Clinic of Laser, Dermatology and Aesthetic
Surgery, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain. dermitek@dermitek.com
BACKGROUND: Pilonidal disease is a chronic disease of
the natal cleft. Recurrent follicular infection is the
causative factor. Surgical treatment has a significant
failure rate, and recurrence is common. Laser removal of
hair in the natal cleft could be an alternative to
surgery. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of
laser hair removal in the natal cleft on pilonidal
disease. METHODS: Six young men with recurrent pilonidal
disease were treated with laser epilation in our clinic
from 2000 to 2003. Most patients had a history of one or
more surgical treatments in the area, and all patients
had suffered recurrent folliculitis for years. An
alexandrite laser was mostly used, although,
occasionally, an intense pulsed light device was used.
The number of epilation treatments ranged from 3 to 11,
performed at 6- to 8-week intervals. RESULTS: All
patients experienced progressive resolution of the
folliculitis with the laser epilation treatments. No
more surgical treatments have been needed. The
treatments were simple and quick, and there were no
complications. CONCLUSION: Laser epilation of the natal
cleft should be considered a first choice treatment for
recurrent pilonidal disease. Preventive laser epilation
of the natal cleft in patients with recurrent
folliculitis could avoid future surgery.
|
| |
|
Back to
Medical Abstracts Index |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Back to
Medical Abstracts Index |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Back to
Medical Abstracts Index |
|
|
|
|
|