Medical Abstracts Page 5

Comparison of Karydakis versus midline excision for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.
Pediatric Surgery International, October 2005

Morden P, Drongowski RA, Geiger JD, Hirschl RB, Teitelbaum DH.

Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0245, USA.

Abstract:

Pilonidal sinus disease is associated with a high rate of recurrence and complications. The Karydakis (KAR) method, whereby an asymmetric subcutaneous flap obliterates the anal crease, has been shown to be effective in adults. The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy of the KAR procedure in the operative treatment of children with pilonidal sinus disease compared to those treated via a midline excision (ME). Sixty-eight cases of pediatric pilonidal sinus excision were reviewed over the past 10 years. Data abstracted included surgical approach, complication rate and recurrence rate. Student's t-test or the Chi square test was used for statistical analysis, with P < 0.05 being considered significant. An ME was performed in 44 patients; the KAR method was used in 24 patients. Mean age at diagnosis was 14.4 +/- 4.2 years for the ME group compared to 15.7 +/- 4.3 years for the KAR patients (P = 0.18). Mean operative time was significantly longer with the KAR method (58.7 +/- 25.6 min) compared to 46.3 +/- 18.6 for the primary ME (P = 0.04). Despite the increased operative dissection, there was no difference (P = 0.42) in early post-operative complication rates between groups (25% in the KAR group compared to 34.8% in the ME group). Initial drainage of an abscess had no significant effect upon the recurrence/complication rate in either group. Recurrence rate alone was lower in patients operated on via the KAR approach 0% versus 11.0% using the ME (P = 0.153). Recurrence and complication rates were lower for those patients with a pilonidal sinus treated by the KAR method compared to the ME, but the results did not reach significance. In conclusion, this study does show a potential benefit for children treated with the KAR method for pilonidal sinus. This study mimics the data obtained in adult patients and suggests that a larger study is likely to achieve significance.
 
Radiofrequency sinus excision: better alternative to marsupialization technique in sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease.
Journal of the National Medical Association,   July 2005


Gupta PJ.

Gupta Nursing Home, Laxminagar, Nagpur, India. drpjg@yahoo.co.in

BACKGROUND: A number of techniques have been described for treatment of patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. The author reports his experience in the surgical management of pilonidal sinus using radiofrequency sinus excision technique. The results are compared with those obtained after excision and marsupialization procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients were operated by radiofrequency sinus excision and 18 with excision and marsupialization. An Ellman radiofrequency device was used. The two groups were matched for age, gender and presentation symptoms. The median follow-up was two years. The patient's satisfaction on the outcome of the procedure was also evaluated. RESULTS: In the radiofrequency sinus excision group, we found on average a shorter operation time (10 vs. 36 minutes, p < 0.001), shorter hospitalization (nine vs. 30 hours, p < 0.001), significantly less postoperative pain, fewer cumulatve requests for analgesia by the patients (14 vs. 25 tablets, p < 0.001), and earlier return to work (six vs. 16 days, p < 0.001) The wounds with marsupialization did heal faster than those with sinus excision; however, the difference was not significant. At two year follow-up, one patient from each group had a recurrence. CONCLUSION: This pilot study shows that this new technique can be performed as a day care surgery. With reduced postoperative pain and early resumption to work, patient satisfaction is better in comparison to excision and marsupialization technique.
 

Successful treatment of recurrent pilonidal sinus with laser epilation.
Dermatologic Surgery, June 2005

Landa N, Aller O, Landa-Gundin N, Torrontegui J, Azpiazu JL.

Dermitek Clinic of Laser, Dermatology and Aesthetic Surgery, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain. dermitek@dermitek.com

BACKGROUND: Pilonidal disease is a chronic disease of the natal cleft. Recurrent follicular infection is the causative factor. Surgical treatment has a significant failure rate, and recurrence is common. Laser removal of hair in the natal cleft could be an alternative to surgery. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of laser hair removal in the natal cleft on pilonidal disease. METHODS: Six young men with recurrent pilonidal disease were treated with laser epilation in our clinic from 2000 to 2003. Most patients had a history of one or more surgical treatments in the area, and all patients had suffered recurrent folliculitis for years. An alexandrite laser was mostly used, although, occasionally, an intense pulsed light device was used. The number of epilation treatments ranged from 3 to 11, performed at 6- to 8-week intervals. RESULTS: All patients experienced progressive resolution of the folliculitis with the laser epilation treatments. No more surgical treatments have been needed. The treatments were simple and quick, and there were no complications. CONCLUSION: Laser epilation of the natal cleft should be considered a first choice treatment for recurrent pilonidal disease. Preventive laser epilation of the natal cleft in patients with recurrent folliculitis could avoid future surgery.
 
 

 

Back to Medical Abstracts Index

 

 
 
 

Back to Medical Abstracts Index

 
 

Back to Medical Abstracts Index

This site is not a substitute for care by a licensed medical professional.
The Pilonidal Support Alliance is a California Non-Profit Corporation and tax exempt under IRS 501(c)(3).